All material below is taken from 10th chapter of the Network logic
The major Argument
Government intervenes into citizens’ social networks through social programmes and may influence network relations.
The major concepts
Types of networks:
“Individualistic networks, which are sparse but open, allow for the
kinds of entrepreneurial and instrumental use of ties that link one to
people very different from oneself.”
“Enclaved networks, by
contrast, are dense but strongly bounded and tend to reinforce ties to
those similarly situated. Here is where we find the mutual support
clubs and some inward-looking ‘communities’.”
“Hierarchical networks are also bounded, but link people with very
different powers and resources in more rule-bound ways. This describes the kinds of ties that link people to those formally allocated
to mentor or counsel them, or the informal ties that link many chairs
of tenants’ associations with the town hall professionals who make
decisions about investments in their housing estates.”
“Isolate networks, the final type, are not necessarily those in which
people know literally no other people, but rather the mix of sparse
and casual ties to others with a few very close ties perhaps to
immediate family members, but which admit of very little reliable
support beyond immediate needs and afford little scope for collective
action.”


